BEREA, Ky. — A proposed Berea ordinance aimed at inoperative vehicles is quickly becoming one of the most debated items on the City Council docket—not because anyone loves seeing a car on flats sitting for weeks, but because residents disagree on what enforcement should look like and who it could impact.
Council heard a first reading of Ordinance 2026-02 in early February. Coverage described the ordinance as intended to empower the Berea Police Department to flag and potentially remove abandoned, inoperable vehicles left on city streets after notice has been served to the owner.
🚙 What the Draft Ordinance Would Do
A summary of the draft ordinance says a vehicle could be flagged as “inoperable” if it appears unable to run, with indicators such as flat tires, missing major components, or expired registration and tags. The draft also sets a threshold of more than 30 days for a vehicle that appears to have been left inoperable on city streets.
👍 Supporters
See the proposal as a basic quality-of-life and safety measure. They argue that long-parked, broken-down vehicles can block sight lines, narrow streets, and create hazards.
👎 What Critics Are Saying
Critics who spoke during public comment raised concerns about how the ordinance is defined and how it would be enforced, including questions about clarity, due process, and whether the language could unintentionally sweep in vehicles that are not “abandoned” but are temporarily out of service.
For the most detailed reporting on the specific comments made during the meeting, readers can review the full account here:
The Edge Report
🔥 Why It Is Generating Heat
According to coverage of the meeting, multiple councilmembers said the draft language was confusing, and city staff indicated the ordinance would be revised to clarify its scope.
One point raised during discussion was whether the policy could be interpreted to sweep in recreational vehicles (RVs) or seasonal vehicles that are not used daily. After the meeting, the city administrator told The Edge that the ordinance was not aimed at RVs or occasional recreation vehicles, and that the target was inoperable eyesores on streets.
🏙️ The Larger Question: Civic Aesthetics vs. Burden
In the background of this debate is a bigger civic question: How much power should a city use to enforce “how things look,” and how do you do it without punishing people who are already stretched thin?
Even residents who want cleaner streets often say they want the policy to include common sense guardrails: clear definitions, reasonable notice, a chance to fix the problem, and flexibility for hardship cases.
⏭️ What Happens Next
Because this ordinance has had a first reading, the next step is expected to be a revised version and further council action at a future meeting. The city posts council agendas and meeting materials through its Agenda Center.
City Agenda Center
Residents who want to weigh in should watch for the next reading and any updated draft language, then consider speaking during public comment or contacting councilmembers before a vote.
📰 More Coverage
More coverage of this same subject can also be found at The Berea Citizen.
Read the Story